Monday, July 14, 2014

Free Writing Class at StoryStudio Chicago

StoryStudio Chicago is an organization dedicated to providing a supportive community for writers of all levels, and on Wednesday, August 27, StoryStudio is hosting an open house and free class:  

Join us for coffee, tea, and conversation with other writers, and then stay for Your Life As Fiction, a fun, all-levels free class that will explore what happens when you combine personal experience with your imagination.

What: Open House and Free Class
Where: StoryStudio Chicago, 4043 N. Ravenswood, Chicago, IL 60613 
Cost: Free!
Click here for more details and to RSVP.

Monday, June 30, 2014

Students who write about the future are more likely to graduate

by Steffanie Triller Fry

“Who Gets to Graduate?” This is the question posed in a May 15, 2014 New York Times Magazine article by Paul Tough. At SNL, the answer to this question is one-in-three. Roughly one in three students who begin the program will graduate within six years. The rest can take longer, transfer to another school, drop out of school, or take a leave of absence. What makes the difference between those who persist and those who do not? According to the article, writing makes the difference.
Research done by a group of psychologists from Stanford says that fear, anxiety, and doubt about belonging and ability keep students from living up to their expectations, especially at moments of transition – like the moment when an adult student decides to return to college or attempt university-level study for the first time.
    In response, Stanford researchers Greg Walton and Geoffrey Cohen designed an experiment to combat these feelings of doubt through writing. They had first-year college students read essays written by upperclassmen that spoke of their experience as freshmen. The message of the essays was, “When I got here, I thought I was the only one who felt left out. But then I found out that everyone feels that way at first, and everyone gets over it. I got over it, too” (Tough). The first-year students then created their own versions of these essays and videos. And the results were stunning:
It had a transformative effect on the college careers of the African-American students in the study: Compared with a control group, the experiment tripled the percentage of black students who earned G.P.A.s in the top quarter of their class, and it cut in half the black-white achievement gap in G.P.A. It even had an impact on the students’ health — the black students who received the belonging message had significantly fewer doctor visits three years after the intervention. (Tough)
Writing researchers long ago identified anxiety as one of the largest barriers to adult college composition. This comes as no surprise to any faculty member who has been teaching at SNL for any length of time. This anxiety often manifests itself as doubt about belonging. Students will say: “I write emails; I don’t write essays.” “I don’t know how to do academic writing.” “I don’t have any ideas to write about.” And anxiety about ability: “I’m not a good writer;” “I always write ______ (fill in the appropriate grammar problem here)” or “I’m just not good at grammar.”
    Luckily, many of the SNL writing faculty have been doing their own versions of Walton and Cohen’s experiment for years. The Handbook for SNL Writing Instructors contains many excellent versions of Walton and Cohen’s initial writing exercise. Perhaps most kin is Jane Wagoner’s “Welcome Letter.” This exercise begins with modeling: Jane writes her own letter to her students, welcoming them to the course. She then asks that they write their own letter in response, including answers to questions like, “Have you ever taken an online or a hybrid course before?” and “What are your other obligations besides college courses?” By reaching out to her students, Jane first welcomes them to class with the letter, reassuring them that they belong. With her questions, she invites them to share their anxieties about writing and being a college student. This personal communication allows students entry into the sometimes antagonistic world of academia. Other assignments on this site, like freewriting, goal and expectation setting, and self-assessments of prior learning, are all ways for students to immediately engage in the course material, rather than feeling anxiety or lack of belonging.
    These assignments are not only useful in writing courses, they are useful in any course. The more an instructor invites students to write into their difficulties, the more practice students will have in writing about difficult topics. The Washtenaw Community College website has excellent suggestions for instructors in all disciplines who want to invite students to write into their difficulties. This kind of writing can encourage conversations about anxiety and belonging early on, before a student has a chance to decide that a course or a topic is too difficult. If more of our faculty employ such early writing in the classroom, maybe we can tell entering students that their chances of graduating are better than one-in-three.

Works Cited

“Ideas for In Class Writing Activities.” English and Writing. Washtenaw Community College, n.d. Web. 28 June 2014.

Tough, Paul. “Who Gets to Graduate?” The New York Times Magazine. The New York Times Company. 15 May 2014. Web. 28 June 2014.

“Writing at the Start of a Course.” Handbook for SNL Writing Instructors. Digication, n.d. Web. 28 June 2014.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Finals Week at the Writing Center

The finals week schedule at the University Center for Writing-based Learning is up, and appointments are going fast! Please let your students know that tutors are still available to help them wrap up coursework, get help with Digication, or polish an AP or ILP. 

Students can click here to log in to the online reservation system, or click here for instructions on how to set up an account. Receptionists can be reached at wcenter@depaul.edu, 312-362-6726 (Loop), or 773-325-4272 (LPC) to answer students' questions or any you may have. You can also request a report from your student's tutor summarizing the session. 

The UCWbL's locations are listed below, but online appointments or requesting written feedback are options as well. These resources are perfect for online, commuter, or working students. 

Loop Campus
(312) 362-6726
25 E. Jackson (Lewis Center)
Suite 1600

Hours
Monday, June 9, 10am-5pm
Tuesday June 10, 10am-5pm
Wednesday, June 11, 10am-5pm

Lincoln Park Campus
(773) 325-4272
2320 N. Kenmore (Schmitt Academic Center)
SAC 212

Hours
Monday, June 9, 10am-5pm
Tuesday June 10, 10am-5pm
Wednesday, June 11, 10am-5pm

Saturday, May 31, 2014

Observations from an Unofficial Cohort


by Kamilah Cummings

This quarter I had the unexpected experience of teaching as a part of a cohort. Granted, it was not an official cohort. However, at the molecular level, it met the definition of one. Despite the unofficial nature of this cohort, I observed some undeniable benefits of this experience for my students and me.

Although an increasing number of institutions that serve nontraditional students are beginning to adopt the cohort model, cohorts are nothing new. In fact, they have been around for decades. However, as the saying goes, “everything old is new again.” For me, this was a new experience.

Carolyn Callaghan, an Associate Dean of Professional, Continuing and Distance Education Studies, describes a cohort as “a group of students who enter a program of study together, share common learning experiences during a specified time period and complete the program at the end of that specified time period.” Having never taught in an official cohort program, I had not given the model enough thought to form an opinion about it. However, viewing my recent experience through the lens of Callaghan’s definition, it is easy to see benefits in this learning model.

One of the three classes I taught this quarter had six students – six diverse women who had all taken another course together in the previous term. The students all started the program around the same time, and though they had different focus areas, they all had a similar timeframe for completing the program. While I have had classes where a few students knew each other, I had never had an experience where every student had taken classes together in succession and was at a similar place in a program.

One of the things that struck me immediately was the familiarity the students had with each other. This created a high level of engaging and surprisingly candid discussions. The students were open about their anxieties about writing, the course, and succeeding in the program as well. In what I dubbed the 10-minute vent, I started each class with a journal exercise and then allowed them to share whatever they wanted with the class. Although I had never incorporated anything like this into a class, it seemed to offer this group a place to share their feelings in a supportive and encouraging environment. I was amazed at the positive impact that this had on the collective energy of the class from week to week. As we transitioned from discussing personal issues to writing, there was never a dull moment. I never found myself grasping for ways to resuscitate the class. I will admit that there were times where I had to steer the focus back to writing, but it was never a difficult task to get them back on track.

Another place where I saw the benefit of the familiarity that these students had with each other was in peer feedback, an integral component of the writing course. Unfortunately, despite the importance of this aspect of writing, students often need prodding to provide constructive writing feedback to peers. However, that was not the case with this group.

In the book Becoming Adult Learners: Principles and Practices for Effective Development, Eleanor Drago-Severson reflects on a study of a group of 16 adult learners who participated in a cohort  as part of the Polaroid Corporation’s Adult Diploma Program. She states that “For these learners, belonging to a cohort, a tightly knit group with a common purpose, proved important to supporting skill development and transformational learning” (72). I witnessed this firsthand with my group. From reminding a citation weary classmate of research skills she had previously demonstrated in another course to offering to help another student who missed class create an ePortfolio, these students were determined to make sure everyone “got it.”

When one student expressed anxiety over an oral presentation she had to make in another class, the other students invited her to practice before them. I obliged. One thing that I learned as part of my unofficial cohort teaching experience was that as the instructor I played a part in maximizing the cohort experience and further cultivating the sense of community that had already been established.

While some argue that adult learners have support networks outside of school, and are less likely to need the type of support offered in a cohort (Drago-Severson 72), I saw a group of students who supported each other in myriad ways. Whenever a classmate expressed feelings of being overwhelmed and wanting to quit the program, others encouraged her to persevere. During the break in one session, they even helped her find classes to register for next term. Unlike my other two classes, none of the students in this class dropped or withdrew. Additionally, they all completed the required assignments.

According to Callaghan, “Cohort members tend to collaborate, interact, exchange resources, share information and support one another in and out of the classroom.” Drago-Severson’s interviews with the students who participated in the Polaroid cohort support this. She found that with the exception of one student, all the students saw their classmates as supports in addition to the teacher (82). This mirrored my experience. My students had no reservations about asking me or each other questions during class. When there were times a student had trouble understanding a concept, others assisted in explaining it to her.

Of the three courses that I taught this quarter, I received the least questions outside of class from this group of students. In sharp contrast, students in my online class, which has little sense of community despite having assignments that encourage it, regularly email and call me with questions. It appears that the online students view me as their only source of support.

Admittedly, I am no expert on cohorts. There are obvious interpersonal, programmatic, financial, and related issues that require consideration before cohort programs can be created. However, I agree with Callaghan who asserts, “. . . cohorts can be supportive systems for student persistence and educational success.” At the end of the day, this is the goal for adult education stakeholders – student persistence and success. My unofficial cohort experience this term leads me to believe that if cohorts provide another route to this destination, they are worth trying.

Works Cited
Callaghan, Carolyn. Cohorts: A New Generation of Diverse Non-Traditional Learners . 4 March 2014. 31 May 2014 <http://www.evolllution.com/opinions/cohorts-generation-diverse-non-traditional-learners/>.

Drago-Severson, Eleanor. Becoming Adult Learners: Principles and Practices for Effective Development. Teachers College Press, 2004.


Thursday, May 22, 2014

The New and Improved Style Manuals

Several years ago, the Modern Language Association issued a new edition of the MLA Handbook. The handbook, now in its seventh edition, was revised to better suit academic writing and research in a digital environment. But even though students now regularly write papers that rely entirely on online sources and incorporate a variety of electronic media, not all have started using the new citation styles.  

Here are just a few of the key updates in the seventh edition: 
  • Citations for online sources do not need to include a URL. The rest of the citation provides enough information that the reader will be able to find the source through a search engine or database. Moreover, URLs are not necessarily stable; a link that worked at the time of writing may be dead before a reader sees it. 
  • For in-text citations from online sources like Web sites, there's no need to use a paragraph or section number in place of a page number, unless the source itself is already numbered. 
  • Now that students have an incredible variety of media at their disposal, making the medium of publication clear is important. Students should indicate whether the source was Print, Web, Radio, Television, DVD, Film, PDF, etc.
  • Computer keyboards have made it much easier to italicize than underline. Anything that used to be underlined, such as book titles, should now be italicized.
MLA has always been the preferred style for scholarly writing in the humanities, but since it also provides highly detailed information about using and citing a wide variety of material, it's also appropriate for projects in which students are likely to draw from both traditional and nontraditional sources (even Twitter). For a more complete list of the changes in the seventh edition, click here to download a PDF compiled by Bedford/St. Martin's. 

The APA Publication Manual was also recently revised and published in a sixth edition. Like MLA, APA style now better supports writers working with online sources. (Click here for a brief overview.) Students writing in education, business, psychology, and other social sciences are likely to find APA style more useful, as well as the format used in much of the source material they will encounter in their research. 

Monday, May 19, 2014

Invite Your Students to Incomplete Project Boot Camps


The boot camp program is designed for SNL students who currently have an incomplete grade on their transcript or students working on writing assignments. Sessions are set up to increase the likelihood students will complete necessary courses to obtain a bachelor’s degree and offer a supportive academic environment, writing assistance, and help with library services so that students can get assignments completed.

Students are welcome to sign up for more than one session. To register, email snlsa@depaul.edu. 

Naperville
Saturday, May 31, 9:00 am-1:00 pm
150 W. Warrenville Rd., Bld. 200

Oak Forest
Saturday, May 31, 9:00 am-1:00 pm
16333 S. Kilbourn Ave.

Loop
Wednesday, June 4, 5:30-9:00 pm
Saturday, June 7, 9:00 am-1:00 pm
14 E. Jackson, Lab 1325

O’Hare
Saturday, June 7, 9:00am-1:00pm 
8770 W. Bryn Mawr Ave.

Items to Bring to Session(s):  Please bring a flash drive, your copy of the incomplete contract if applicable, all prior assignment preparation, including research material, assignment instructions, and assignment writing format (APA/MLA). Please let your faculty mentor know you plan to attend if you are working on an assignment for an incomplete grade.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Announcing the 2014 Writing Showcase Winners

SNL Writing is proud to announce the winners of the 2014 SNL Writing Showcase. Please congratulate them on their excellent work! The essays will be posted to the Writing Guide over the next few weeks, and the winners will be honored at the Awards Luncheon in June. 

Katie Reginaldi: "In Support of a Church Garden" and "Adventures in the Community Garden"

Ronnie Malley: "Andalusia: A Journey of Music and Cultural Exchange"

Marc Raffa: "Let's Get Bready, To Give Back!" 

Angelique Guinn: "Fundamentalism and the Modern American Woman"

Sarah Bishara: "An Analysis of Employee Perceptions of Motivational Factors in the Workplace" 

Jason Meyer: "Splice of Life: The Beatles and the Tale of Their Tape"